The antitrust settlement will resolve allegations that Sutter Health engaged in anticompetitive practices, resulting in higher healthcare prices for self-funded plan members. A Superior Court of California judge has granted preliminary approval for a $575 million antitrust settlement Sutter Health proposed to resolve a case alleging that it engaged in anticompetitive practices that drove up healthcare prices in Northern California. The Sacramento-based health system reached the settlement agreement over a year ago with plaintiffs, including California Attorney General and current HHS Secretary nominee Xavier Becerra and the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UEBT). The settlement agreement will now be heard by a court for final approval on July 19, 2021. The settlement resolves a class action lawsuit brought on by UEBT in 2014 claiming that Sutter’s anticompetitive business practices caused them to pay more for healthcare items and services than necessary. Attorn

Nearly two-thirds of the largest hospitals in the US have yet to fully comply with the new price transparency rule, with most missing payer-specific charges. Many of the largest hospitals in the country are still not complying with a new price transparency rule that went into effect on Jan. 1, 2021, according to a new analysis . Nearly two-thirds of the 100 largest hospitals in the US by certified bed count did not meet all the requirements of the new rule, including posting payer-specific negotiated charges on their websites, by early February 2021, researchers from Hilltop Institute, a nonpartisan research organization at the University of Maryland, recently reported in the Health Affairs blog. What’s more, just 22 percent of the hospitals in the analysis appeared to be fully compliant with the rule’s requirements, with some even exceeding the regulation in terms of the amount of pricing information they shared on public websites. Researchers deemed hospitals compliant if their files