Achieving best-in-class billing for behavioral health practices

 Billing is one of the most critical parts of running a behavioral health practice. This is especially true for large practices, as maximizing efficiency at scale significantly affects their revenue cycle. It’s important to set realistic expectations about the mental health billing process, which isn’t easy to integrate into regular workflows.

To take on practice billing, clinicians must devote time to learning and accommodating new processes. This includes creating clean claims and monitoring them after submission, correcting and resubmitting rejected claims, negotiating denials, collecting payments from patients, and reconciling bank statements. If any of these steps are skipped, clinicians risk losing some of the reimbursement that is due.

Expecting too much too quickly can lead to disappointment and possibly burnout, neither of which are conducive to competent practice management. Behavioral healthcare billing can be challenging at first, but plenty of clinicians and practices have mastered it with the right tools and guidelines. This includes:

Setting sensible income goals

Clinicians should use billing best practices to their advantage to maximize reimbursement for services. However, they should be patient with the process. It takes time to hone in on service coding skills and become adept at negotiating with payers. These changes will increase a practice’s revenue, but it won’t happen overnight.

Developing a reporting system

To understand a practice’s revenue cycle, clinicians should set up reporting, whether they do that independently or use billing software. A system with advanced reporting features can help clinicians understand exactly what is happening in the revenue cycle. Billing software should provide an overview of aging claims and show how many days each claim has been waiting. This tracking helps with cash flow and allows practices to fix mistakes and denials more quickly.

Payment breakdown reports show which payments have been received from insurance and which from patients so they can be reconciled with bank statements. Productivity reports for providers, while not directly related to billing, nevertheless help make practices more profitable. Also, provider efficiency can be reviewed and reminders can be sent about submitting bills on time.

Setting up a repeatable process

Behavioral health practices should compose a written process for billing procedures that every staff member will follow. This guide should include every step from creating and coding the bill, to submitting it, tracking it, following up on rejections/denials, and receiving payment. This is the best way to stay organized and prevent any oversights.

It is important to document what information to gather from new patients when to perform insurance eligibility checks, and how claims are generated once services are complete.

Practices should keep a schedule for submitting claims, track them, investigate aging claims, and respond to rejections and denials.

Additionally, insurance coverage for existing patients should be periodically checked. Some practices run the insurance information for every patient before each appointment because a patient’s insurance status may change at any time, while other practices find this checking frequency too burdensome and instead schedule specific days to update insurance information.

Creating a good billing cadence

The cadence of these tasks will differ depending on the size of the practice and the number of individuals devoted to the billing process. For individual therapists, it’s best to check documentation regularly and claims submissions throughout the week, designating time to review any rejected and unpaid claims.

Larger practices with a dedicated biller on staff should visit the revenue cycle every day. Staff should routinely submit each day’s claims, work on a portion of claims that require follow-up, check bank statements, and collect patient payments. If a practice is large enough to have one or more billers on staff, the billing workload is heavy enough to require constant and thorough attention. All providers and practices should aim to review their list of aging claims at least every 30 days.

Creating a discipline of regularly managing the revenue cycle is vital for practices today or work will backlog quickly and revenue could be lost. This includes making time to carefully check each claim, running reports on a regular basis, and filing claims promptly after treatment.

Behavioral health practices must be adept at medical billing to survive. Whether they opt to bill in-house or vet and partner with a competent third party to manage the process, it is essential to have a meticulous billing process in place in order to truly flourish.

Ram joined Valant in 2020 as an experienced technology executive to lead the organization through its next stage of growth. His passion for listening to the customer and building strong teams, coupled with his demonstrated ability to drive scalability, provide a solid foundation for Valant to grow as it finds new ways to serve the behavioral healthcare market.

Popular posts from this blog

IMPORTANT UPDATE: Ohio Medicaid is upgrading its provider enrollment system

Effective August 1, 2022, ODM will not be accepting new provider enrollment applications or continue any in-progress enrollment applications through the MITS Provider Enrollment System. Details on the process for enrollment of new OhioRISE providers from August 1 to October 2022 will be communicated prior to August 1st. Effective October 1, 2022, all provider enrollment applications must be submitted using Ohio Medicaid’s new Provider Network Management (PNM) portal. After its implementation, the PNM portal will be the single point for providers to complete provider enrollment, centralized credentialing, and provider self-service. Provider Network Management Portal and Centralized Credentialing Beginning on October 1, 2022 the Provider Network Management (PNM) portal will accept Medicaid provider enrollments and carry out centralized credentialing functions. This transition will reduce administrative burden for providers and enable providers to focus on the more meaningful and importan
Read more

Medical Billing Companies Spill About Outsourcing Operations

  A recent survey of medical billing companies shows a positive outlook on revenue cycle outsourcing, with many seeing payment collection as an opportunity. Nearly two-thirds of medical billing companies have a rising positive outlook about the current state of the revenue cycle outsourcing industry, according to a recent  survey  from Tebra. The practice growth technology company recently surveyed 277 medical billing company owners, leaders, and team members serving independent practices and clinics in the US. The majority of respondents belonged to companies that serve less than ten practices and clinics. Medical billers are optimistic about the future of the industry despite increased competition, healthcare consolidation, and other unfavorable macro forces. About 43 percent—up from 27 percent in 2018—reported outsourcing of medical billing as a significant opportunity to leverage technology to optimize services, reduce repetitive tasks, and boost revenue.
Read more

CO Supreme Court: Hospital Cannot Enforce $229K Surprise Bill

The surprise bill stemmed from the hospital’s chargemaster rate, but the hospital did not provide this information to the patient before her surgery. The Colorado Supreme Court has ruled that a woman is not liable for her $229,000 surprise bill from a Centura Health hospital, as the hospital did not disclose the amount to her before the procedure. Lisa Melody French received spinal surgery at St. Anthony North Hospital in Westminster, Colorado, in 2014. The hospital initially estimated that the surgery would cost $57,601, with French responsible for paying $1,337 out-of-pocket. But the cost increased to $229,112 following the surgery. According to the court document, the new price tag reflected Centura’s full chargemaster rates for the surgery. Additionally, Centura determined that it had misread French’s insurance card and she was an out-of-network patient. French was left with the nearly $230,000 bill after her insurance paid $73,597 of the new charge, which was over $300,000. Fren
Read more