3 Revenue management KPIs people don’t talk about

 


3 Revenue management KPIs people don’t talk about

These non-traditional KPIs have a significant impact on collections and cashflow.

3 Revenue management KPIs people don’t talk about

In 30 years of running revenue management the usual suspects come up in a Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Dashboard such as Charges, Payments, Adjustments, Net Collection, Gross Collection, Days in AR, AR over 90 Days and Bad Debt. Then you have the breakouts for each category by payer, CPT Code, Location, or ICD Code.

There are 3 other KPIs that I track that may not be traditional KPIs, but they have a significant impact on collections and cash flow.

Denials

You probably notice the C codes related to denials such as CO 11 – Diagnosis Inconsistent with Procedure, CO 22 – Coordination of Benefits, CO 167 – Diagnosis is Not Covered, etc.

I take the time to program a listing of denial codes that make sense to the practice. The C Codes are very generic and can only go so far to alert you of denial patterns and potential issues. I always ensure I have a listing of denial codes that correlate with the C codes and provide more pertinent information. For example, if I receive a denial of CO11 I would have several categories such as Need additional medical information from physician, diagnosis not covered with procedure, need additional modifier.

Getting the denial and correcting the issue for that claim is not enough. Many times, I notice repeated instances of correcting the same issue on multiple claims. Once you identify the denial, seek to place a rule in your billing system that would correct this denial before the claim is sent out. The goal is to prevent the denial from ever happening.

I seek to quickly capture trends in the denials before they result in a bulge of denials that become difficult to manage and get paid due to volume. Payers may have different denials for specific procedures and diagnosis in accordance with their policies or your contract. Weekly I review any denials to ascertain if there is a trend or an accumulation of denials before it becomes an acute issue.

Always remember, the goal is not to correct the denial quickly but to prevent it from ever happening.

Number of touches

The Number of Touches indicates the number of times a specific claim has been worked. The claim may have been resubmitted, identified as still in process, in appeals, additional information being submitted, etc.... I will look for claims that have been touched multiple times, usually more than 3 and then I drill down. It is not infrequent to see claims that have been touched 15-20 times. The objective when working the Accounts Receivable is to get the outstanding claims resolved, not to solely perform an action that may perpetuate the unpaid claim. Sometimes incentives are misaligned and incentive the number of accounts worked as opposed to number of accounts paid. I am always looking for a claim to get paid within 3 touches.

When it gets beyond the 3 touches, I tell my team not to hesitate about ringing it up the ladder. Sometimes if claims are denied by a payer, it could indicate there is an underlying issue such as the status of the provider, a failure to update a new policy, a contract not being uploaded or a glitch in the system. Creating a culture of rewarding the right outcomes and encouraging communication when there is an issue is imperative in running an effective revenue management department.

Forecasts

I have weekly meetings with my revenue management team. Usually these take about 30 minutes. To the outsider it may seem simple and common sense. However, I find this practice vital. Establishing the amount each month you are expected to bill out and collect and comparing to actual charges and collections is a quick gauge of how collections and charges are doing throughout the month. You will be able to quickly identify any issues with this simple review. My teams found trend in denials, issues with the payment cycle of a payer or missing charges from this simple review. It is not uncommon to find organizations where their Accounts Receivable and financials are in disarray because they have not implemented a forecast even in its simplest form.

Waterfall analysis

I utilize a Waterfall analysis in estimating the amount of collections in any month. A Waterfall analysis is a report that indicates the percentage of collections contributed by each month. For example, if you are running a Waterfall analysis in June you may find 20% of the collections come from charges in that month, 35% come from charges entered in May, 20% come from charges entered in April, etc.... I find this along with modifications made for specific events such as seasonal differences or temporary closure of a location provides a decent estimation of collections.

Incorporating these 3 KPIs into your analysis will help you identify issues in a timely manner and improve collections and cash flow.

Jonathan Friedman, MBA, is CEO of PRN Advisors.

Popular posts from this blog

IMPORTANT UPDATE: Ohio Medicaid is upgrading its provider enrollment system

Effective August 1, 2022, ODM will not be accepting new provider enrollment applications or continue any in-progress enrollment applications through the MITS Provider Enrollment System. Details on the process for enrollment of new OhioRISE providers from August 1 to October 2022 will be communicated prior to August 1st. Effective October 1, 2022, all provider enrollment applications must be submitted using Ohio Medicaid’s new Provider Network Management (PNM) portal. After its implementation, the PNM portal will be the single point for providers to complete provider enrollment, centralized credentialing, and provider self-service. Provider Network Management Portal and Centralized Credentialing Beginning on October 1, 2022 the Provider Network Management (PNM) portal will accept Medicaid provider enrollments and carry out centralized credentialing functions. This transition will reduce administrative burden for providers and enable providers to focus on the more meaningful and importan...
Read more

CO Supreme Court: Hospital Cannot Enforce $229K Surprise Bill

The surprise bill stemmed from the hospital’s chargemaster rate, but the hospital did not provide this information to the patient before her surgery. The Colorado Supreme Court has ruled that a woman is not liable for her $229,000 surprise bill from a Centura Health hospital, as the hospital did not disclose the amount to her before the procedure. Lisa Melody French received spinal surgery at St. Anthony North Hospital in Westminster, Colorado, in 2014. The hospital initially estimated that the surgery would cost $57,601, with French responsible for paying $1,337 out-of-pocket. But the cost increased to $229,112 following the surgery. According to the court document, the new price tag reflected Centura’s full chargemaster rates for the surgery. Additionally, Centura determined that it had misread French’s insurance card and she was an out-of-network patient. French was left with the nearly $230,000 bill after her insurance paid $73,597 of the new charge, which was over $300,000. Fren...
Read more

Governor DeWine Announces Local Government Payments from National Opioid Settlement Begin

Image
    Ohio Governor Mike DeWine announced Friday that the first payments of funds to local governments from the OneOhio settlement with national opioid distributors have been made electronically. Local governments will determine how to use the payments, totaling more than $8.6 million, to best combat the opioid epidemic in their own communities. Following these initial payments, governments will continue receiving payments from the settlement over the next 18 years. In 2017, as Ohio Attorney General, Governor DeWine was one of the first in the nation to sue opioid makers and drug distributors for their role in flooding the market with massive amounts of highly addictive opioids. A complete list of payments made to eligible and participating political subdivisions may be found at https://nationalopioidsettlement.com/states/ohio/ . The list also indicates if the payment was made directly to the entity or, if less than $500, was redirected to the county. Questions about payments c...
Read more