CO Supreme Court: Hospital Cannot Enforce $229K Surprise Bill

The surprise bill stemmed from the hospital’s chargemaster rate, but the hospital did not provide this information to the patient before her surgery.

The Colorado Supreme Court has ruled that a woman is not liable for her $229,000 surprise bill from a Centura Health hospital, as the hospital did not disclose the amount to her before the procedure.

Lisa Melody French received spinal surgery at St. Anthony North Hospital in Westminster, Colorado, in 2014. The hospital initially estimated that the surgery would cost $57,601, with French responsible for paying $1,337 out-of-pocket. But the cost increased to $229,112 following the surgery.

According to the court document, the new price tag reflected Centura’s full chargemaster rates for the surgery. Additionally, Centura determined that it had misread French’s insurance card and she was an out-of-network patient. French was left with the nearly $230,000 bill after her insurance paid $73,597 of the new charge, which was over $300,000.

French had signed a hospital services agreement (HSA) wherein she agreed to pay all charges of the hospital that were not covered by her health insurance, but the contract did not include any reference to the hospital’s chargemaster.

After unsuccessfully attempting to collect payment from French, Centura sued French for breach of contract, alleging that she had agreed to pay Centura’s chargemaster rates when she signed the HSA. Centura had concluded that her agreement to pay “all charges” included the predetermined rates in its chargemaster.

During the trial, the jury determined that French only owed Centura an additional $767, but the Colorado Court of Appeals overturned the verdict. Judge Terry Fox stated that the “all charges” referenced in the HSA unambiguously referred to its chargemaster rates and that the bill was enforceable. In addition, Judge Fox noted that hospitals cannot always accurately predict what services a patient will require.

This ruling led French to appeal to the Supreme Court.

The Colorado Supreme Court sided with French and ruled that the HSA did not include any reference to Centura’s chargemaster; therefore, French had no knowledge of the price for her surgery outside of what the hospital had initially told her.

Additionally, the court determined there was no mutual agreement between French and Centura about the meaning of “all charges” and whether or not it included the chargemaster.

“If a charge for hospital services is not included in a hospital-patient contract, then we believe that a jury is fully capable of determining the reasonable value of the services provided,” Justice Richard L. Gabriel wrote in the opinion.

Centura representatives testified during the trial that its chargemaster was not provided to patients. What’s more, Centura refused to produce the chargemaster for French, stating that it was proprietary and a trade secret.

In addition, an expert witness for French estimated that the surgery cost around $70,000 and Centura had profited from excessively billing French and her insurance plan.

“As courts and commentators have observed, hospital chargemasters have become increasingly arbitrary and, over time, have lost any direct connection to hospitals’ actual costs, reflecting, instead, inflated rates set to produce a targeted amount of profit for the hospitals after factoring in discounts negotiated with private and governmental insurers,” Gabriel wrote.

Gabriel also noted that even if French had received Centura’s chargemaster, it would have been incomprehensible as it contained 50,000 codes.

The surprise billing law under the No Surprises Act aims to protect patients from high out-of-network medical bills like the one French received. Payers and providers must go through an arbitration process to determine the payment rate for the service.

But French’s case raises the question of whether patients and payers will be able to use HSAs and contract law to resist paying arbitration amounts since the price was not established in any initial agreement.

Call Today: 614.706.5206

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Popular posts from this blog

IMPORTANT UPDATE: Ohio Medicaid is upgrading its provider enrollment system

Effective August 1, 2022, ODM will not be accepting new provider enrollment applications or continue any in-progress enrollment applications through the MITS Provider Enrollment System. Details on the process for enrollment of new OhioRISE providers from August 1 to October 2022 will be communicated prior to August 1st. Effective October 1, 2022, all provider enrollment applications must be submitted using Ohio Medicaid’s new Provider Network Management (PNM) portal. After its implementation, the PNM portal will be the single point for providers to complete provider enrollment, centralized credentialing, and provider self-service. Provider Network Management Portal and Centralized Credentialing Beginning on October 1, 2022 the Provider Network Management (PNM) portal will accept Medicaid provider enrollments and carry out centralized credentialing functions. This transition will reduce administrative burden for providers and enable providers to focus on the more meaningful and importan
Read more

Medical Billing Companies Spill About Outsourcing Operations

  A recent survey of medical billing companies shows a positive outlook on revenue cycle outsourcing, with many seeing payment collection as an opportunity. Nearly two-thirds of medical billing companies have a rising positive outlook about the current state of the revenue cycle outsourcing industry, according to a recent  survey  from Tebra. The practice growth technology company recently surveyed 277 medical billing company owners, leaders, and team members serving independent practices and clinics in the US. The majority of respondents belonged to companies that serve less than ten practices and clinics. Medical billers are optimistic about the future of the industry despite increased competition, healthcare consolidation, and other unfavorable macro forces. About 43 percent—up from 27 percent in 2018—reported outsourcing of medical billing as a significant opportunity to leverage technology to optimize services, reduce repetitive tasks, and boost revenue.
Read more